|
Today more than ever, safety professionals and
plant managers have a wide range of personal cooling technologies from
which to pick. To help you better understand the selections, we've gathered
information on all of the available technologies and offer it to you on the
following pages.
As you review the
technologies, be sure to keep in mind the requirements of your particular
application. The pros and cons of each technology will help you select the
personal cooling system that best meets your needs.
Umbilical systems.
Fluid-chilled systems:
|

|
- Fluid reservoir holds
ice to cool
circulating fluid.
- Variable-speed pump
circulates fluid
and controls rate of flow.
- Tube
garment carries cool fluid to body and
draws away heat toward reservoir.
|
|
Fluid-chilled systems
consist of a garment, a fluid reservoir, a circulating pump, and connecting
hoses.
The fluid in the
reservoir is chilled by ice to 33º to 34º F, then circulated by the pump
through tubing passages in the vest-like garment. The chilled fluid will
rise 6º to 7º F while moving from the pump to the garment. As the fluid
passes over the skin, the body transfers heat toward the cooler fluid,
which then carries the heat back to the reservoir. As the fluid re-enters
the reservoir, the ice chills it back down and the circulation process
begins again.
Either batteries or an
AC adapter operates the circulation pump. (Batteries are used when mobility
is required.) The battery life is typically 4 to 5 hours between recharges.
This can create a problem when long-duration cooling is needed, as a change
of batteries will be required at least once during the day.
The temperature of the
fluid at the body can be controlled somewhat by changing the speed of the
pump motor. This regulates the rate of flow, which, in turn, determines the
amount of heat drawn from the body.
Fluid-chilled systems
are efficient and work well. But mobility is limited because the reservoir
and pump are separate from the garment. Some systems operate with a hip
pack containing an umbilically attached reservoir and pump. These systems
allow greater mobility, but add weight to the body and have limited space
for ice, which limits the length of operation.
Another concern with
fluid-chilled systems is that they can promote the formation of
condensation due to their cool operating temperature range. This can cause
some efficiency loss and dampness to the body.
PROS:
|
|
Garments are
available in all sizes and fit most areas of the body.
|
|
|
Can be worn against
the skin and are generally close fitting; uniforms easily fit over
garments.
|
|
|
Long-duration
cooling.
|
|
CONS:
|
|
Limited mobility
due to umbilical connected circulating reservoir and pump.
|
|
|
Formation of
condensation can cause efficiency loss and dampness.
|
|
|
More expensive than
other technologies.
|
|
|
Requires
electricity or batteries to operate.
|
|
Pre-chilled- or forced-air systems:
|

|
- Vapor compressor
pre-chills air and
pumps toward vest.
- Umbilical carries
chilled air to garment
from fixed compressor location.
- Body
garment forces chilled air against
body and carries heat toward atmosphere
via convection.
|
|
Pre-chilled- or
forced-air systems consist of a torso garment, a compressor, and an
umbilical.
The compressor forces
pre-chilled air through the umbilical and into a bladder in the garment.
The air is then forced against the body through a series of orifices in the
inner surfaces of the garment. As the cooler air passes near the surface of
the skin, it convectively draws heat away from the body and into the
atmosphere.
These systems are
lightweight and provide efficient cooling, but mobility is restricted by
the length of the umbilical. They also employ many moving parts in the
compressor and require regular maintenance.
PROS:
|
|
Garments are
available in all sizes and fit most areas of the body.
|
|
|
Provides a
comfortable cooling temperature range.
|
|
|
Lightweight garment
construction.
|
|
|
Long-duration
cooling.
|
|
CONS:
|
|
Mobility is limited
and encumbered by the umbilical, which must be attached to a fixed
compressor location.
|
|
|
More expensive than
most technologies.
|
|
|
Requires
electricity to operate.
|
|
|
Moving parts
require regular maintenance.
|
|
Passive systems.
Ice or gel pack vests.
|

|
- Carrier holds ice packs
against body.
- Insulation minimizes
absorption of ambient
heat by ice packs.
- Ice packs
solidify at 32º F and absorb body
heat until saturated.
|
|
Ice or gel pack vests
consist of a torso garment containing pockets, surrounding the chest
cavity, that hold ice packs. Body heat, carried to the surface of the skin
by the circulatory system, is absorbed by the ice packs.
The garment fully
loaded with packs is heavier than an umbilical-type garment, but is
completely unattached to any external devices, making it much more portable.
Typical weight is 9 pounds for a 100º F product and 11 pounds for a 125º to
130º F product. Cooling duration is approximately 1 to 1-3/4 hours between
recharges based on average workload and individual metabolic rate. The
packs recharge in five hours in a freezer and can be recharged literally
thousands of times. When considering whether an ice or gel pack vest is the
right choice, first determine how easily the wearer will be able to change
packs on the job. After all, once the packs lose their cooling charge, they
do nothing but add weight to the wearer.
A concern with this
technology is that the ice packs condense, since their temperature is below
the typical dew point. The condensation generates heat, which is then
absorbed by the pack, reducing the duration before another recharge is
needed. Also, the condensation is absorbed by clothing, causing discomfort
and adding weight, which creates a greater load on the body.
Ice technology provides
a reduction of body core temperature when used for short periods. However,
with prolonged exposure (several hours of continuous use) the core
temperature can actually begin to rise. This is due to vasoconstriction
that occurs in the blood vessels carrying core heat to the surface of the
skin. The 32º F temperature of the packs causes the vasoconstriction. The
continued cold exposure of the packs to the skin fools the brain into
thinking it is cold outside. The body then attempts to retain heat when, in
reality, it should be giving up heat.
Since workload
continues to generate even more heat, the core temperature rises. This
condition can cause faintness and dizziness. If full workload continues,
there is a serious risk of heat stroke.
In addition to
vasoconstriction and the resultant physical problems, extended cold
exposure to the skin can cause harm to skin tissue and the development of
flu-like symptoms.
PROS:
|
|
Inexpensive.
|
|
|
Portable; no
umbilical device needed.
|
|
|
Rechargeable.
|
|
CONS:
|
|
Fools body into
thinking it's cold, which could be potentially dangerous
(Vasoconstriction).
|
|
|
Packs condense;
uncomfortable to wear.
|
|
|
Undergarments
required to avoid direct contact with skin; defeats purpose of cooling.
|
|
|
Bulkier to wear
than umbilical systems.
|
|
|
Requires freezer to
chill.
|
|
|
Limited-duration
cooling.
|
|
CoolPack Technology:
|

|
- Carrier holds CoolPack
against body.
Wicking fabric carries perspiration away
from body toward outside of garment.
- Insulation minimizes
absorption of
ambient heat by CoolPacks.
- CoolPacks
solidify at 65º F and
absorb body heat until saturated.
|
|
Phase change material
vests consist of a torso garment with chest pockets that hold CoolPacks
packs, similar to ice and gel pack vests. Body heat, carried to the surface
of the skin by the circulatory system, is absorbed by the packs, which
operate at 65º F.
The garment fully
loaded with packs is heavier than an umbilical-type garment, but is
completely unattached to any external devices, making it much more
portable. Typical weight is 3 pounds for a 100º F product and 9 pounds for
a 125º to 130º F product. Cooling duration is approximately to 2.5 hours
between recharges based on average workload and individual metabolic rate.
The packs recharge in 20 minutes in ice water or a freezer, and can be
recharged indefinitely.
Because the temperature
range of the packs (65º F) is well above the typical dew point, the packs
will not condense and will remain dry against the body.
The temperature of
phase change material packs is within the comfort range of the body, so the
garment can be worn for extended periods without risk of vasoconstriction
or skin tissue damage.
Phase change material
packs can not absorb as much heat as ice packs, but this limitation is
offset by a lower loss of cooling potential to the ambient air temperature
(because the differential between the ambient and the 65º F packs is less
than the differential between the ambient and 32º F ice).
PROS:
|
|
Comfortable
temperature against the skin; no undergarment required.
|
|
|
Inexpensive.
|
|
|
Portable; no
umbilical device needed.
|
|
|
Packs will not
condense; no irritating moisture against the skin.
|
|
|
Wicking action
removes perspiration.
|
|
|
Easy to recharge in
ice water; no freezer needed.
|
|
CONS:
|
|
Bulkier to wear
than umbilical systems.
|
|
|
Limited-duration
cooling.
|
|
Evaporative cooling.
|

|
- Carrier holds water
absorption crystals
against body.
- Crystals
absorb water when immersed,
then evaporate the water to atmosphere to
create cooling.
|
|
Evaporative technology
consists of a garment and a water absorption material. The garment is
extremely lightweight and the technology is inexpensive.
To use the garment,
simply soak it in water and put it on. The crystals in the cloth swell up and
contain water held closely against the body. The process simulates the
body's evaporative cooling system as it evaporates the water held in the
garment to the atmosphere. The phase change from water fluid to water vapor
creates a tremendous cooling energy. There is some efficiency loss over
natural perspiration evaporation because the water is not in actual
conductive contact with the skin, but is actually cooling air between the
absorption crystals and the skin.
The concept is simple,
but has several drawbacks. Most obvious is that evaporative technology
works well only in warm, dry air. When the humidity is high and the air
already saturated with water vapor, the technology cannot work. There is a
hybrid version of this technology, which suggests placing the
water-saturated crystals in a freezer to solidify. The frozen crystals
provide some absorption cooling in high humidity, but only for a very short
duration, since the total amount of retained water is minimal.
Another drawback is
that the garment is always damp, which can cause skin irritation, bacterial
growth, mold, and odor.
PROS:
|
|
Most inexpensive.
|
|
|
Extremely
lightweight.
|
|
|
Portable; no
umbilical device needed.
|
|
|
Longer-duration
cooling.
|
|
CONS:
|
|
Requires the
movement of warm, dry air across them to be effective; completely
ineffective under any type of protective garment.
|
|
|
Won't work in high
humidity.
|
|
|
Tends to be damp
against the body; can cause skin irritation, bacterial growth, mold,
and odor.
|
|
Environment cooling.
|

|
- Spot-cooled area
restricts worker mobility.
- Workers
outside cooled area derive no
cooling benefit.
|
|
There are many methods
of conditioning and ventilating the air around workers. The purpose of this
guide is not broad enough to include all methods, but a brief overview of
benefits and concerns is presented.
If workers operate in a
closed, contained space, it's possible to provide spot environment cooling.
There are a number of methods available, and results will vary based upon
the ambient temperature, humidity, and mobility of workers.
The simplest method is
to provide good ventilation and a flow of fresh outside air. This can be an
effective method against lower temperatures of 80º to 90º F, as the air
movement will induce evaporation of perspiration. When the temperature
rises above 90º F, however, this method is no longer effective, as the
differential between circulating air temperature and skin temperature is
too small, so body heat can no longer be drawn away.
Another method is to
use spot air pre-chillers. This is effective for cooling a small group of
workers in higher heat, but is an expensive approach and limits workers
mobility to the cooled area. Also, as workers constantly move back and
forth between hot and cold areas (e.g., to get parts or to perform other
temporary work), they can develop flu-like symptoms over extended periods
of exposure.
In addition to the
initial expense of these types of environment cooling systems, keep in mind
that there will be an ongoing maintenance cost, plus the utility cost to
run them.
PROS:
|
|
Allows good worker
mobility, but only within cooled area.
|
|
|
Temperature is
easily controlled.
|
|
|
Can be turned off
when not required.
|
|
CONS:
|
|
Most
expensive.
|
|
|
Not
effective for outdoor situations.
|
|
|
Not
effective for large groups of workers.
|
|
|